<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not Romney?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/</link>
	<description>an unseemly mix of politics and Mormonism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:25:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David H. Sundwall</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4688</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Sundwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4688</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Veep stakes probably won&#039;t do a whole lot of good, but Palin seems to be making a big splash as of today.  It&#039;s too early to tell but she may really soften some of his hard edges.  

Obama&#039;s big speech is already off the front pages and she&#039;s dominating today&#039;s news.  

It&#039;s definitely made a bigger impression than what was thought to be the inevitable and boring Romney or Pawlenty pick.  

I agree with David, that after the last few weeks I&#039;m starting to think that McCain isn&#039;t trying to imitate Dole and may actually want to win the race.  
Strange!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Veep stakes probably won&#8217;t do a whole lot of good, but Palin seems to be making a big splash as of today.  It&#8217;s too early to tell but she may really soften some of his hard edges.  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s big speech is already off the front pages and she&#8217;s dominating today&#8217;s news.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s definitely made a bigger impression than what was thought to be the inevitable and boring Romney or Pawlenty pick.  </p>
<p>I agree with David, that after the last few weeks I&#8217;m starting to think that McCain isn&#8217;t trying to imitate Dole and may actually want to win the race.<br />
Strange!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>&quot;Still, let’s be honest here–neither Biden nor Palin are going to swing this election, no matter how many political analysts are going to try to claim otherwise.&quot;

Very true. The VP candidate tend to fade to the background quickly after the convention season (with the VP debate being an exception).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Still, let’s be honest here–neither Biden nor Palin are going to swing this election, no matter how many political analysts are going to try to claim otherwise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very true. The VP candidate tend to fade to the background quickly after the convention season (with the VP debate being an exception).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4685</link>
		<dc:creator>David B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4685</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s Palin, which makes me think McCain may actually be serious about trying to win this election. (I mean, the chatter recently had been Romney or Pawlenty, who might&#039;ve been gold for the base, but were worse than boring. Palin or Jindal both had much more potential upside, as i saw it.)

Still, let&#039;s be honest here--neither Biden nor Palin are going to swing this election, no matter how many political analysts are going to try to claim otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s Palin, which makes me think McCain may actually be serious about trying to win this election. (I mean, the chatter recently had been Romney or Pawlenty, who might&#8217;ve been gold for the base, but were worse than boring. Palin or Jindal both had much more potential upside, as i saw it.)</p>
<p>Still, let&#8217;s be honest here&#8211;neither Biden nor Palin are going to swing this election, no matter how many political analysts are going to try to claim otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinoblanco.blogspot.com</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4681</link>
		<dc:creator>chinoblanco.blogspot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 09:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4681</guid>
		<description>It is Romney.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/romney_to_appear_in_dayton_tom.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is Romney.</p>
<p><a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/romney_to_appear_in_dayton_tom.php" rel="nofollow">http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/romney_to_appear_in_dayton_tom.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4678</guid>
		<description>BTW, I am not sure if there is any real credibility in the rumors about it not being Romney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I am not sure if there is any real credibility in the rumors about it not being Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4676</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4676</guid>
		<description>I argued in favor of Romney because it would help the Democratic ticket here:

http://faithpromotingrumor.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/pick-romneyplease/

If he is not picked, he would be in a McCain cabinet. If not (and I am hoping that there will not be a McCain cabinet) he will likely be a mission president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argued in favor of Romney because it would help the Democratic ticket here:</p>
<p><a href="http://faithpromotingrumor.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/pick-romneyplease/" rel="nofollow">http://faithpromotingrumor.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/pick-romneyplease/</a></p>
<p>If he is not picked, he would be in a McCain cabinet. If not (and I am hoping that there will not be a McCain cabinet) he will likely be a mission president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/08/28/its-not-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-4675</link>
		<dc:creator>David B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1408#comment-4675</guid>
		<description>It amazes me how much effort people expend on veepstakes speculation, when (with the possible--merely possible!--exception of JFK-LBJ) VP nominees have simply not had any effect on who won the presidential election since at least the 1920s, probably earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me how much effort people expend on veepstakes speculation, when (with the possible&#8211;merely possible!&#8211;exception of JFK-LBJ) VP nominees have simply not had any effect on who won the presidential election since at least the 1920s, probably earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
