<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raising the bar on patriotism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/</link>
	<description>an unseemly mix of politics and Mormonism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:25:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David H. Sundwall</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/comment-page-1/#comment-4875</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Sundwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1515#comment-4875</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think either assertion are normal for people who disagree with me and didn&#039;t say so.   I think both lunatics (Biden and the ethicist) aren&#039;t taken too seriously (most people don&#039;t offer to pay more taxes voluntarily and yet are still patriotic) but I found the common sentiment interesting. 

That &quot;ethicist&quot; may be your random kook but too many ethicist are sounding more and more kooky and I find it a little alarming that someone who should be taken seriously can credibly express such an idea.  More troubling than a random propane explosion.  

A word of warning: my posts can be sort of tongue-in-cheek and shouldn&#039;t be taken as blanket condemnations of those who may disagree with me (as ill-advised as that is).

You&#039;re certainly right that there are plenty of wing-nuts who may be on my political &quot;side.&quot;  I&#039;d like to think I can disagree and denounce them for the kooks they are too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think either assertion are normal for people who disagree with me and didn&#8217;t say so.   I think both lunatics (Biden and the ethicist) aren&#8217;t taken too seriously (most people don&#8217;t offer to pay more taxes voluntarily and yet are still patriotic) but I found the common sentiment interesting. </p>
<p>That &#8220;ethicist&#8221; may be your random kook but too many ethicist are sounding more and more kooky and I find it a little alarming that someone who should be taken seriously can credibly express such an idea.  More troubling than a random propane explosion.  </p>
<p>A word of warning: my posts can be sort of tongue-in-cheek and shouldn&#8217;t be taken as blanket condemnations of those who may disagree with me (as ill-advised as that is).</p>
<p>You&#8217;re certainly right that there are plenty of wing-nuts who may be on my political &#8220;side.&#8221;  I&#8217;d like to think I can disagree and denounce them for the kooks they are too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/comment-page-1/#comment-4874</link>
		<dc:creator>David B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1515#comment-4874</guid>
		<description>Is it a legitimate concern? Sure--but so is the possibility that the propane tank on my neighbor&#039;s grill will blow up (despite the fact that it gets taken care of properly, as far as i can tell), damaging that wall of my house. In other words, it&#039;s something that&#039;s possible, but unlikely to the point of nearly impossible.

What you&#039;re doing is quoting a single lunatic, and making it sound like that person is taking the normal position that someone who disagrees with you has. This makes it into not an illegitimate concern, but rather an illegitimate point for debate.

If you want to avoid such fallacies, you at least need to include a (sincere!) acknowledgment that such positions aren&#039;t the norm for people proposing or supporting (depending on whether their jurisdiction has it) universal health care.

Of course, if you&#039;re gonna insist on setting up strawmen like this, i can think of some right-wing lunatics i could start quoting... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a legitimate concern? Sure&#8211;but so is the possibility that the propane tank on my neighbor&#8217;s grill will blow up (despite the fact that it gets taken care of properly, as far as i can tell), damaging that wall of my house. In other words, it&#8217;s something that&#8217;s possible, but unlikely to the point of nearly impossible.</p>
<p>What you&#8217;re doing is quoting a single lunatic, and making it sound like that person is taking the normal position that someone who disagrees with you has. This makes it into not an illegitimate concern, but rather an illegitimate point for debate.</p>
<p>If you want to avoid such fallacies, you at least need to include a (sincere!) acknowledgment that such positions aren&#8217;t the norm for people proposing or supporting (depending on whether their jurisdiction has it) universal health care.</p>
<p>Of course, if you&#8217;re gonna insist on setting up strawmen like this, i can think of some right-wing lunatics i could start quoting&#8230; <img src='http://asoftanswer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Sundwall</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>David H. Sundwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1515#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>David - 

I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s definitely going to happen here.

But how does calling it a strawman argument make it less of a legitimate concern?  (I&#039;m not that up on my logical fallacies I guess).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s definitely going to happen here.</p>
<p>But how does calling it a strawman argument make it less of a legitimate concern?  (I&#8217;m not that up on my logical fallacies I guess).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/comment-page-1/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>David B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1515#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>Strawman, yes? Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strawman, yes? Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOYDMB</title>
		<link>http://asoftanswer.com/2008/09/21/raising-the-bar-on-patriotism/comment-page-1/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>NOYDMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 02:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asoftanswer.com/?p=1515#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>Yet another reason why we shouldn&#039;t want the government choosing who gets what kind of health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reason why we shouldn&#8217;t want the government choosing who gets what kind of health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
