book of mormon

You are currently browsing articles tagged book of mormon.

Sen. Bennett runs for FAIR president or something.

Sen. Bob Bennett knows that The Book of Mormon is true, and now he wants others to read how he came to that conclusion in a new book he has written.

The book, published by LDS Church-owned Deseret Book, comes as the Utah Republican faces a tough re-election challenge from within his own party ranks. . .

“I offer it in the hope it will convince all who have an interest in The Book of Mormon, be they believers or skeptics, that any decision with respect to its origins requires a leap of faith,” Bennett wrote in the preface to his 584-page book.

Odd timing but 584 pages seems more than your usual campaign tome.

25 August 2009 @ 7:53 pm | 2 comments

Brick of Mormon Stories

One of the new blogs I recently added to LDS and Mormon Blogs is Brick of Mormon Stories. It’s author was kind enough to send me a copy of his book, conveniently titled Brick of Mormon Stories.

As you may gather, the book is a collection of 26 stories from the Book of Mormon illustrated with LEGO enacted scenes. It may sound silly but I thought it was pretty cool and my family has enjoyed it (It may help if you are a LEGO enthusiast).

My eight and six year-olds especially like the book and only wish they were more pictures. Brick of Mormon Stories seems like it would be a good stepping stone to help out children starting to read the Book of Mormon. While we have been reading the illustrated Book of Mormon Stories the children can now read the actual text from the Book of Mormon but with entertaining photos.

I recommend you check out Book of Mormon Stories and get a copy yourself if you’re interested (I liked the book so much, you’ll notice I placed an ad over in the column but the only thing I got out of it was a free copy).

Perhaps there’s something to the Gospel and LEGOs. My second-cousin made a LEGO replica of the Nauvoo Temple that is on exhibit at the Washington D.C. Temple Visitor Center.


While 84% of Americans consider the Holy Bible to be a holy book, a whopping three percent consider the Book of Mormon to be holy too. That may be low but it’s in good company (and over the Torah!?).

Only three books were recognized as holy by at least 1 percent of Americans. The Koran trailed behind the Bible in second place with 4 percent; the Book of Mormon as labeled by 3 percent as sacred/holy; and the Torah was deemed holy by 2 percent of the public.

10 July 2008 @ 4:12 pm | 3 comments

Nearly 40 years ago, the story of how chiasmus were discovered in the Book of Mormon.

19 May 2008 @ 2:45 pm | No comments

Check out The Peeps of Mormon.  Featuring my favorite, “The tasty demise of King Noah” (I just read that this morning). [via Kaimi]

21 March 2008 @ 9:20 am | No comments

I did not know that.  My great-great-great-grandfather, Daniel Webster Jones,  was charged by Brigham Young to start the first translations of the Book of Mormon into Spanish, telling him that “the he would hold me responsible for its correctness.” 

I need to read his book, Forty Years Among the Indians: A True yet Thrilling Narrative of the Author’s Experiences Among the Natives.   And work on my family history.

19 March 2008 @ 2:34 pm | 5 comments

Mormon Mentality: “Joseph Smith as the anti-Mystic“:

If you’re going to invent a new scripture, the Book of Mormon is exactly the opposite kind of book a mystic would write.

11 March 2008 @ 3:22 pm | No comments

The Laffer Curve, Lamanite taxation and why Harry Reid should re-read the Book of Mosiah.

6 March 2008 @ 11:47 am | 8 comments

Funny passages in the Book of Mormon

5 February 2008 @ 2:34 pm | No comments

On Wednesday Jeff Lindsay posted on a fascinating article about the guerrilla warfare tactics of the Gadianton Robbers and their modern-day analogues.  Especially in light of yesterday’s tragic events, it’s especially interesting to compare Pakistan and the Middle East to what happened in the Book of Mormon:

When the Gadianton robbers start off, they start off as an urban terrorist group really, involved in assassinations. But they eventually have to flee into the mountains and this is typical of guerrilla groups in our own century. And they’ll talk at length about how the best places to work are in cities, where you can hide among the urban masses. Or if that doesn’t work—as it didn’t work for the Gadianton robbers—they then flee into inaccessible territory, almost always mountains. It was, in all three cases (in China, Vietnam and in Cuba), the mountains into which the guerrillas fled. Then they make lightning raids out of the mountains to attack settled civilizations. But they choose only those times when they can win. They can make a lightning strike, do some damage, then get away. This, of course, irritates the authorities to no end. And the authorities then will send troops into the mountains after the guerrillas, but the mountains are the guerrilla’s native territory. The guerrilla then chooses the place to fight from. He ambushes the regular troops that come after him. He causes them immense casualties.

28 December 2007 @ 1:04 pm | No comments

The Deseret News has a short response from the Church on the change to the Introduction of the Book of Mormon:

The current Introduction page in the Book of Mormon was not part of the original text translated by Joseph Smith, Jr. The Introduction was written and published at the same time additional materials including footnotes and cross references were added in 1981. A one-word change was made to the Introduction in the latest edition of the Book of Mormon published by Doubleday. That change takes into account details of Book of Mormon demography which are not known. The change will be included in the next edition of the Book of Mormon printed by the Church.

Next edition! When?

9 November 2007 @ 5:53 pm | 2 comments

Does the Book of Mormon Introduction change hint at a forthcoming edition of scriptures with more revisions? Probabaly not soon, but some interesting speculation would suggest so.

9 November 2007 @ 9:27 am | No comments

Book of Mormon Intro Altered, Slightly

The Salt Lake Tribune points out that the Church has made a small but significant change in the introduction to the Book of Mormon, acknowledging that today’s Native Americans may not be direct descendants from the Lamanites.

The original sentence in questionis the last sentence of the second paragraph from the Book of Mormon Introduction reads:

After thousands of years, all were destroyed except the Lamanites, and they are the principal ancestors of the American Indians.

Apparently this change first appears in Doubleday’s revised edition which reads:

After thousands of years, all were destroyed except the Lamanites, and they are among the ancestors of the American Indians.

The Trib says that the Church will be publishing scripture editions which will also have the change.  So far the online edition has not been changed.

UPDATE:  Mormon Wasp asks some good questions. Post seems to have been taken down.


Unique missionary opportunties: Pakistani looking for a book on bomb making leads him to something a little safer.

12 September 2007 @ 9:42 am | No comments